0-100 km/h Calculator
Calculate 0-100 km/h acceleration time from horsepower, weight, and drivetrain. Compare with times car makers publish and see average G-force.
Enter horsepower and weight.
How Does the Formula Work?
This calculator gives a rough 0-100 km/h estimate from power, weight and drivetrain. It adds the quarter-mile time from Patrick Hale's 1986 formula and the average G of the run, then places your result among 0-100 times that car makers publish.
Drivetrain factor: FWD 1.00 | RWD 1.10 | AWD 0.95
Under 2.0 s the result is shown as ≤ 2.0 s
0-60 mph ≈ 0.94 × the 0-100 time
¼ mile ET = 5.825 × (weight lb ÷ hp)^⅓ (Hale)
Average G = (100 ÷ 3.6) m/s ÷ time ÷ 9.80665 m/s²
Example: 300 hp, 1,500 kg, AWD
1.1 × 5 × 0.95 = 5.225, shown as 5.2 s
Class: ⚡ Fast
A Rough Rule, Not a Measurement
The 1.1 coefficient and the drivetrain factors are this site's own rule of thumb; no published study stands behind them. A real sprint depends on tyres, gearing, traction control, the launch and on how each maker runs its test, so the estimate is for comparing cars rather than for predicting a stopwatch. Under 2.0 seconds the rule no longer means much, and the result reads "≤ 2.0 s". That limit belongs to the rule and not to physics: Rimac publishes 1.81 seconds for the Nevera, a car of 1,914 hp and 2,300 kg, and for those figures the rule drops below its floor.
Power-to-Weight Ratio
Weight divided by power is the only property of the car the rule looks at. A 300 hp car of 1,500 kg has 200 hp per tonne, exactly like a 200 hp car of 1,000 kg, and the rule gives both the same time. The result shows hp/t and kg/hp side by side so you can set them against the figures in a maker's specification.
Quarter Mile
The quarter-mile time (402 metres) comes from Patrick Hale's 1986 formula ET = 5.825 × (weight/hp)^⅓, with the weight in pounds including the driver, and the end speed from his companion formula with the constant 234. Stealth 316, which documents those constants, compared them with Road & Track tests of 243 street cars: the predicted times were quicker than the cars managed, while the speeds matched far better. For the Nevera's published power and weight the formula gives 8.1 seconds; Rimac lists 8.25 seconds over 402 metres.
Average G-Force
Average G is the speed gained, 100 km/h or about 27.8 m/s, divided by the time and by standard gravity, 9.80665 m/s². A run of 3 seconds averages 0.94 G. It is an average across the whole sprint, so the strongest moment is at least that high; the calculator does not try to estimate the peak.
Benchmark Cars
The comparison list holds seven cars whose makers publish a 0-100 km/h time: Rimac Nevera 1.81 s, Tesla Model S Plaid 2.1 s, Porsche 911 Turbo S (2025) 2.5 s, BMW M3 Competition (2020) 3.9 s, VW Golf GTI (2024) 5.9 s, Togg T10X V2 7.5 s and Toyota Corolla 1.8 Hybrid (2023) 9.2 s. Each maker tests its own way, so a tenth or two between them says little; your car is slotted in by its estimated time and highlighted.
Tips & Recommendations
Switch between FWD, RWD and AWD to see how the rough rule treats each one: AWD quickest, RWD slowest.
A 3-second run averages 0.94 G. The result shows the average for your estimated time.
Seven cars with times their makers publish, from the Nevera to the Corolla. Your car is placed by its estimate and highlighted.
Time and end speed from Hale's formula. Expect a street car to run slower than the estimated time.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is 0-100 km/h time estimated?
With this site's own rough rule: 1.1 × (kg ÷ hp), multiplied by a drivetrain factor. It is meant for comparing cars; real times depend on tyres, gearing, traction control and conditions.
What does the drivetrain change?
In the rule, all-wheel drive multiplies the time by 0.95 and rear-wheel drive by 1.10, with front-wheel drive as the base. These factors belong to the rough rule; they are not measured values.
What is 0-60 mph?
60 mph is 96.56 km/h, a little under 100 km/h. The calculator takes the 0-60 time as 94% of the 0-100 estimate.
How is the quarter mile calculated?
With Patrick Hale's 1986 formula ET = 5.825 × (weight_lb ÷ hp)^(1/3), the weight including the driver. Checked against road tests, it predicts quicker times than street cars run, so read it as optimistic.
Why is a result shown as "≤ 2.0 s"?
The rule is floored at 2.0 seconds because below that it stops tracking real cars. Some cars are quicker: Rimac publishes 1.81 seconds for the Nevera. When the rule falls under the floor, the calculator shows the ≤ sign instead of printing 2.0 as if it were exact.
Recent Calculations
No calculations yet
Sources
- Stealth 316: Formulas for 1/4 mile ET & mph vs. hp & wgt, documenting Patrick Hale's 1986 constants 5.825 and 234
- Rimac Automobili, Nevera: 0-100 km/h in 1.81 s, 1,914 hp, 2,300 kg
- Tesla Türkiye, Model S Plaid: 0-100 km/h in 2.1 s, 1,020 hp
- Porsche Newsroom (7 Sep 2025), 911 Turbo S Coupé: 523 kW (711 PS), 0-100 km/h in 2.5 s
- BMW Group PressClub (23 Sep 2020), M3 Competition Sedan: 375 kW, 0-100 km/h in 3.9 s
- Volkswagen Newsroom (14 May 2024), Golf GTI: 195 kW (265 PS), 0-100 km/h in 5.9 s
- Togg Media Center, T10X V2: 160 kW, 0-100 km/h in 7.5 s
- Toyota Europe Newsroom, 2023 Corolla: 1.8-litre hybrid 140 DIN hp, 0-100 km/h in 9.2 s